Improvement will ever make them competent.
PATHFINDER MOVIE MOVIE
“Pathfinders: In the Company of Strangers” is in the second category ofīad war movies, but it is so bad that there is no way the participants couldīest, if they maxed out on this movie, they should never work on another movie Hopefully at least the persons responsible were sincere and tried theirīest, although their best was crap. This can be excused because of a low budget. Movies that are just plain bad because of a combination of poor production And the more critical acclaim they receive,Ĭategory of bad war movies – the ones that should have been much better and ruined Movies like “Braveheart” piss me off to no end. I usually reserve extreme umbrage for films What the buzz is on a movie, so I am seldom terribly disappointed. I am not easily impressed, but I also have a high tolerance for bad Over fifty a year and that is a conservativeĮstimate. Site that I love war movies and I watch a ton of them. What happens is pretty much what you expect.It will come as no surprise to anyone who visits this And, should you fall asleep and miss the ending, don't worry. Pathfinder wants to provide a jolt of adrenaline ironically, it works better as a tranquilizer. I have heard comparisons made to both Conan the Barbarian and Apocalypto, but Pathfinder is so far below those movies in entertainment value that it feels almost criminal to include the titles in this review. The story is shallow and uninteresting, the stakes are low, and the camera work and editing are so overly "artistic" that they destroy the coherence of the action sequences. The main problem is that, for all of its sword fights and chase scenes, Pathfinder isn't fun. Director Nispel tries to re-enforce how big a badass his chief Viking is by having the guy come back from the dead in true action movie villain fashion, but the resurrection will be greeted with a yawn by those who are still awake. As for the bad guys… Aside from the fact that they're all dressed alike in those bulky Viking costumes which makes it impossible to tell one from another, the don't inspire much in the way of antipathy.
The secondary characters are an even bigger joke as far as audience identification is concerned - when one of them is drawn-and-quartered (a particularly nasty form of death), it provokes a shrug. Sure, Ghost is supposed to be the protagonist but, in the end, it will be tough to find anyone who's worried about whether or not he'll survive the orgy of bloodletting. The thing that makes it tough to enjoy Pathfinder is that there's no character worth caring about. Then there's the curious situation of the Vikings speaking Norwegian and the Native Americans speaking English. Moon Bloodgood could pass for a Native American (even though she's not), but her utterance of phrases like "I'm not gonna leave you behind" hurts the image. Karl Urban, for example, looks kind of fearsome, but speaking ruins the effect. Things become tedious during the film's lengthy down times, when we're subjected to what passes for dialogue being uttered by actors who would impress more if they didn't say anything. Pathfinder, which is a remake of the 1987 Norwegian film Veiviseren, is barely tolerable during the action sequences, even though the camera moves around so much it can be difficult to figure out what's going on. Ghost is accompanied by two companions: Pathfinder (played by Russell Means, who got lost here on his way to The Last of the Mohicans) and his daughter (Moon Bloodgood), a.k.a. That's where the hacking, slashing, and chasing begins. Eventually, his countrymen return, led by Gunnar (Clancy Brown) and bent on ethnic cleansing. He is raised by the locals and becomes a great warrior. Ghost (Karl Urban) is a Norwegian child left behind when the Vikings first visit the North American continent some 1100 years ago. The premise is borrowed from Tarzan with Native Americans standing in for the apes and the Vikings replacing the English. Someone should remind director Marcus Nispel that there's a difference between making a music video and a feature film. To add insult to injury, the movie is filmed in a way that makes it seem like the camera has epilepsy and the color desaturation renders everything murky. Pathfinder feels like one of those generic '80s action films where there's plenty of violence with no suspense, lots of stunt work but no excitement, and a cast of characters so poorly developed that it's easier to care about the background scenery.
0 kommentar(er)
